Last year, the Royal Australian College of
Surgeons issued a Press Release on the matter of excessive
surgical fees. The then President states
“Although government data shows that almost 90 per cent of medical services in
the private sector last year had no associated costs to patients we are still
seeing reports in the media of excessive and even extortionate fees”.
How does the Government and other health
organization’s get hold of this data?
Lets look at the typical billing situation.
When a surgeon bills a patient for a surgical service in the private sector, the
entire fee is provided on an invoice with a breakdown of costs as appropriate. The privately insured patient will take the
invoice to Medicare Australia and their Health Fund. Medicare and the Health Fund will pay 75% and
25% of the Medicare Benefit Schedule (MBS) Fee respectively. Most surgeons
charge above the MBS fee and the difference between their surgical fee and MBS
fee is the out of pocket gap payment that is the responsibility of the patient.
Obviously, data on the amount of the gap
payment can be recorded.
As a result of the publicity directed to
the excessive amounts of gap payments, some surgeons had every reason to believe that information being
collected about their practices had the potential to come back and bite them in the future.
I used to think that this data was
reliable.
It never crossed my mind that surgeons would think of rorting this
data collection to hide the fact that they were charging exorbitant fees.
I was contacted by an old friend who asked
to catch up with me for a coffee. Let's
call him Bart (not his real name). Bart is smart man, and smells bullshit from
a mile off. He had a story that he wanted run by me for my opinion.
His wife had undergone
surgery for breast cancer and had been referred to a plastic surgeon for breast
reconstruction. The surgical fee was
quite large at $15,000 but he was prepared to pay this as the surgeon had come especially recommended by the oncologist, whose opinion they trusted unconditionally.
To be clear, he specified that he had no complaint or concern about
the amount of the surgical fee.
Bart wanted to reconcile why he was being
given two separate accounts. He was given one
account for the value of $5000 which was to be the paperwork to be taken to
Medicare and the Health Fund. A further
receipt was given for $10,000 which was attributed to gap payment. This receipt made no reference to being a
surgical service for which a rebate from Medicare or a Health Fund could be
obtained. Bart indicated that this
seemed to be a bizarre way of doing things and had his suspicions that this
might be something to do with deceptive practice. It is easy to see how most people would not
give it further thought since they have been billed exactly what they had been
quoted.
He saw my lights go on as he relayed this
story to me. It was plain obvious to me that
this plastic surgeon was trying to deceive the Federal Government as to exactly
what he was really charging the patient.
He was attempting to distract from any future attention that might be
directed to him as a surgeon who was charging in the higher echelons for his
surgical services. As far as the government would be concerned, he was only charging $5000 for his surgical services in spite of the real fee being $15,000.
This is not illegal but I call it out for
being a deceptive and unethical practice.
(The amounts are not the actual dollar amounts that Bart and his wife were charged but rounded to nearest sums to help illustrate the billing practice and to protect his anonymity.)
Where money is concerned many of us are ethically "flexible". It's not that you choose to chege a fee, but there has to be a perception of fairness. It is not a free market, as specialists are referred to by another doctor, limiting the patient's choices and knowledge of the marketplace. Imagine if you could only buy cars from one dealer. What would that dealer do if they were unscrupulous?
ReplyDeleteWhere money is concerned many of our colleagues are less than ethical. The system of referral to a specialist also means the there is no free market for specialists, making the perception that the more expensive one is the better a false one (sometimes expoused by some of my patients). Imagine if you could ony buy a car from a designated dealer. You couldn't chose whether you are getting a Hyundai or Mercedes. The dealer would also know you are locked in and could charge what they want.
ReplyDelete